Working with a club 5 months pre-open
A club that started marketing five months before it had courts — and opened to a waiting list instead of an empty room.
Read itAll case studies
StackEleven · Client Case Study
Helping a struggling club after they had already been open for 6 months
One club bet its growth on the least glamorous product on the schedule — the beginner class — and then built a pipeline to keep those players and progress them. Eighteen months later it is the strongest location in its market, and every month of 2026 has beaten the month before it a year earlier.
- Client
- Suburban club, Mid-Atlantic
- Engagement start
- June 2025
- Platform
- GrowMyClub + club booking platform
- Data through
- 31 Jul 2026
+59%Revenue growth, H1 2026 vs H1 2025Six full months, like for like
7 of 7Months in 2026 that beat their 2025 counterpartEvery month, without exception
11.5×Beginner-class return on ad spendLifetime revenue from 502 students
$4.25Cost per lead2,733 leads to date
Monthly revenue, 2025 vs 2026
Indexed so January 2025 = 100. Dollar values withheld. Every month shown is complete.
20252026
What we actually did
This club did not grow by selling more court time to people who already played. It grew by keeping a steady flow of newcomers coming in the front door — and then, crucially, by not losing them.
01
Keep the front door open
Beginner instruction — 101 and 2.0 classes, basics sessions, newbie open play — became the headline offer in every ad rather than an afterthought buried in the schedule. Intake is up 85% against the months immediately before the engagement began.
02
Build a pipeline behind it
Every beginner lands in a tracked pipeline with automated follow-up — the next class, the beginner open play, the newbie ladder. Nobody finishes a first lesson and gets forgotten.
03
Move them up the ladder
The goal was never the $25 clinic. It was the 3.0 player twelve months later who plays three times a week, pays for a league, and brings a partner. That is where the growth actually shows up.
The clearest proof that this works is not the class roster — it is the turnstile. Average monthly check-ins ran 2,144 across the first half of 2025 and 4,164 across the same months of 2026: foot traffic almost exactly doubled, growing faster than revenue itself. More people are in the building more often, and the intake tier is where they started.
The beginner class is not a loss leader. It is the top of the only funnel that reliably produces long-term members.
Beginner registrations per month
101 and 2.0 classes, basics sessions, and newbie/beginner open play. Excludes “advanced beginner” leagues.
Did the beginners stick?
This is the part most clubs never measure. We took every player whose first beginner-tier booking came before February 2026 — 514 people, each with at least six months of runway since — and followed them forward.
44%Graduated past the beginner tierBooked programming beyond beginner level
18%Went into competitive league playLadder leagues and rated events
31Average visits per playerSince their first beginner session
1.7×Lifetime value vs the average player25% played in the last 90 days
More than four in ten of the people who walked in knowing nothing have moved past beginner programming altogether, and nearly one in five is now playing rated, competitive pickleball at the same club. They did not arrive as intermediate players to be won from a competitor — the club made them. They are worth 1.7× the average registered player over their lifetime, and they come back: 31 visits each on average since that first session. That is the compounding asset — a 2025 beginner is a 2026 league regular, and league regulars are the most durable revenue a club has.
Why the first five sign-ups matter most
Every operator knows an empty session stays empty while a filling one fills faster. Here that instinct is measurable — and it is one of the strongest patterns in the data.
How long the next person takes to sign up
Median hours between consecutive sign-ups, across the same 1,081 sessions.
The other half of the pattern is what happens to sessions that never get going. Of 4,668 sessions on the calendar since January 2025, 1,122 — very nearly a quarter — never got past two sign-ups, and between them they account for just 3.5% of all attendance. The busiest 15% of sessions carry 46% of it. There is very little middle ground: sessions either catch or they don't.
This is the real argument for the beginner pipeline, and it is easy to miss. The operational job is not to fill a session — it is to get the first few people into it, because the session fills itself after that. A newcomer who books a Tuesday beginner open play is not worth one registration; they are worth the handful that follow them in once the roster stops looking empty. Automated follow-up that reliably puts three or four names on a session before it opens is doing something a discount never could: it is manufacturing the momentum that the rest of the club then rides for free.
An empty court is the most expensive thing in the building. The cheapest way to fill it is the first four people.
The facility ten minutes away
There is a comparable pickleball facility roughly ten minutes away. It opened before this club did, in the same catchment, drawing on the same population. It is still open and still trading today.
It does less than half the revenue.
Same market, same sport, same weather, earlier start. The difference is not the real estate and it is not demand — it is that one of the two facilities systematically creates its own players instead of competing for the ones who already exist.
How “beginner” is defined
Beginner intake counts 101 classes, 2.0 classes, basics sessions, and newbie/beginner open play, coached and non-coached — the full intake ladder. Everything else — including every “advanced beginner” and “experienced beginner” ladder league, clinic and round robin — counts as post-beginner play, because those are players who have already progressed. Lifetime value is compared against all registered players at the club on the same basis. Registration history was backfilled directly from the club's booking platform in July 2026 and is complete and de-duplicated from December 2024 onward; January 2025 reads low because the club had only just opened. Revenue and check-in figures come from separate feeds with continuous coverage over the same period.
How the beginner-class ROI was calculated
This is a beginner-class return, not a whole-club one. Every player who has ever taken an introductory 101 class — 502 people — was tracked from that first class to today, and their combined lifetime spend at the club was divided by all paid media spend on the account ($11,620 across every campaign since launch). Both sides measure the same thing from end to end: what was spent filling the top of the funnel, and what those players have spent since.
- It credits paid media with every 101 student, including anyone who found the class by word of mouth or walked in — so it reads as the return on the beginner programme as a whole, not a strictly attributed one.
- Working the other way, it ignores all revenue from players the ads brought in who never took a 101 class. Widening it to the full beginner intake ladder (727 players) gives 20.4×.
- Lifetime revenue is counted to date and is still accruing — a student who started last month has barely begun to contribute, so the figure grows on its own.
- Return is on media spend only and excludes StackEleven fees, so it is a return on advertising, not on total engagement cost.
- Revenue is settled order and registration value synced from the booking platform, excluding membership mirror rows and coaching income.
- Every month charted is a complete calendar month; August 2026 is in progress and is excluded throughout.
- The nearby-facility comparison is operator-reported and is not drawn from platform data.